Bri responds to Frank.

Read her blog here.

How to be a lying chicken the Frank Walton way!

He's lying, again!

Anyway, let's debunk Frank's blog. Now, Frank said that Brian Sapient avoided a debate with Todd Friel.

Brian Sapient avoided a debate with Todd Friel by claiming he "doesn't have anything real new, he's uninteresting, he's dishonest, and he does a lot of interrupting, a lot of commercial breaks when you're saying important stuff, he does a lot of quote-mining..." etc.

*SIGH*

I already wrote about this in my other blog.

Why waste time debating someone like Todd? Todd is known for cutting HBA off the show. Oh well...


Sapient would rather debate Todd's bosses (Ray and Kirk).

That's 2 on 1. Right, Frank? Because you also said this...

3. Don't do one-on-one debates. Instead, have you and your friends debate your lone opponent.

As I said above, Sapient will gladly debate Kirk and Ray, all by himself.

Do you still want to call him a coward?

4. If you find out an opponent of yours is a darn good debater, avoid debating them by lying about them. Say that he's a a quote-miner, he's too easy to beat, he's a plagiarizer, or a liar, etc. By ruining their reputation it'll make it look like they are not worth debating.

More lies!

I've seen how the members from TheologyWeb debate. They suck! There's this member from TheologyWeb with the username 'lilangelofterror'.



Yup, she said:

I look for atheists to debate.

She is a 22 year old woman who registered at freethinkingTEENS.com to debate younger atheists and she refused to debate at the RRS message board.


Back to tearing Frank's blog a new one...

6.Make sure your opponent is as shallow minded as they come, or unprepared, or naive.


That's right, only debate those you know you can beat. Don't debate those who are good thinking theists. That may leave an opportunity for your opponent to outsmart you. And you can't have that happen. But if that happens, again, gang up on him. Got to rule #3.

LOL! What a liar!

At TheologyWeb, the theists gang up on the atheists, and I can prove it too! Just look around the forum for 2 seconds. (Random thread!)

3. Don't do one-on-one debates. Instead, have you and your friends debate your lone opponent.

Always, gang up on your opponent. Remember, it's easier to beat up a guy when you have more people with you. Brian Sapient usually has 5 (that's right, 5, including himself) people against a lone Christian. 5 against 1! Can you beat that!

Oh, man...

Brian has said that he will take on Ray and Kirk by himself and he's been waiting on Ergun to respond for over a week.


Now that you know how to be a lying chicken the Frank Walton way, it's time to learn how to debate the TheologyWeb way!

Yay!

Are you ready? Here it goes.

1. Lie your ass off.
2. Grow it back.
3. Lie it off again.

That's right! It's that simple! LOL!

Does Frank think Bruce Lee sucks?

The following screen shot is from Frank's 'I've been tagged' blog.



Now, I'm not trying to say that Frank thinks Bruce Lee sucked as a fighter...but as an atheist!

That's right, Bruce Lee was an atheist.

I'm pretty sure that Frank likes watching Bruce Lee's movies and everything. But does he care that Bruce was an atheist?

Just check out Frank's blog headline.

(If you’re an atheist and you’re reading this, don’t take yourself too seriously, okay? We love ya, but we hate your philosophical views.)

He hates our philosophical views, huh? Well, Bruce Lee was a philosopher!

Remember his "be like water" philosophy, huh Frank?!

*SIGH*

Anyway, I'm a real big fan of Bruce Lee and I wish he was still alive, too.

We're fake atheists!

Is Richard Dawkins a pretend atheist? Yes, the world's most prominent atheist is really a fake atheist!

That's what P-Dunn (aka Pee Dung) says! Check it out right here:

"Simply put, you can't be happy and be a real atheist at the same time."

Dawkins has been an atheist for about 50 years. Are you seriously telling me that he has never been happy at any point? According to Pee Dung, yes!

And if he was happy, he had to be faking his atheism at that point?

Ladies and gentlemen, the most outspoken atheist in the world is really a fake!

Same goes for George Carlin, Ernest Hemingway, Frank Zappa, Lance Armstrong, Ray Romano, James Watson, Bertrand Russell, Katharine Hepburn, Sigmund Freud, Penn & Teller, and every single other atheist that ever lived on the planet! According to Pee Dung, we're all pretend atheists!

Where was Comfort to expose his disciple's lie?

Yesterday, on The Way of The Master radio, Todd Friel said that Brian Sapient "...won't agree to come on the show."

Ray Comfort was out of the studio when Todd said it and came in 20 minutes after the comment.

Where was Ray to expose Todd's lie? Sapient agreed to come on the show if Ray AND Kirk were going to be there. You can download Brian ripping Todd a new one, right here. Just right-click and save it.

By the way, Todd is a stupid name, it's obvious why he turned out so stupid. LOL!

Todd is known for getting his butt kicked in debates like with The Infidel Guy and Dan Barker. Todd cut HillbillyAtheist off the air when he appeared. You can check out what HBA had to say about his appearance on Way of The Master, right here.

And Todd getting his ass handed to him by Dan Barker here.

Update: Brian just received an email from Ray Comfort. More to come.

Frank Walton doesn't care about his parents!

We've found the reason that Frank Walton has so much time to spew lies on the internet. Not only can he not handle looking at attractive women, but his parents are also "dismayed" by his ridiculous beliefs.



Maybe they also know about how he blogs on "atheismsucks" with such an immature online persona it's no wonder that Frank Walton has parents that are dismayed by him. Poor Frank Walton, does someone need a hug? Can't handle women, can't handle parents, has a mind disorder (theism), and spends his days writing to atheists online linking them to his crappy blog all day... what a pathetic excuse for existence. What a pathetic excuse for a Christian. It's no wonder the Rational Response Squad equates theism with a mind disorder, here you have a Christian who let's the world know with almost every correspondence that Christianity is indeed a religion of intolerance. Good job Frank, keep helping people to see why Christianity does nothing to make you a good person.

Now be a good little boy Frank and abandon those myths so that your parents don't have to be discouraged and depressed at your amazing low thinking capacity. How disrespectful of you!

Is Frank married?

I was checking out Frank's new blog, Brian Sapient goes Girls Gone Wild!, in which he writes about his jealousy of Brian (he was recording Kelly and she quickly flashed him) and Kelly's chest. There was no nudity in the video, but it doesn't matter, Frank wrote a blog about it.

Anyway, when I was done reading, I noticed that he had 4 comments at the time, so I decided to read the comments and check out what his readers had to say. As it turns out, Frank is married!

I don't understand! Just look at his comments .




See that? Frank is married.

Damn, imagine what it's like to be "Mrs. Frank Walton". That must suck.

I'm still confused though. Frank's myspace tells another story. His myspace says he's "single".



Don't tell me that he had no time to answer his "status" when he first joined myspace. He answered the other details as you can see.

Looks like someone likes playing with the facts.

Response to Frank's pointless videos.

Ya feel me?

Frank's blog on Dawkins.

In an interview in 1997, Richard Dawkins was asked to "give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome." Apparently unable to answer, he paused a long time and finally responded by changing the subject.

1. According to Dawkins, he paused because the question revealed that the interviewers were creationists, that he had been duped about their motives. He paused to think about how to handle them, and the change of subject occurred due to the several minutes when he confronted them being omitted from the video (Dawkins 2003).
   
   
2. The question is equivalent to asking how complexity could evolve, which Dawkins has covered in at least four books (The Blind Watchmaker, River Out of Eden, Climbing Mount Improbable, and A Devil's Chaplain). He has answered the question at great length.
   
   
3. The ability of a single person to answer a question is largely irrelevant. The scientific literature is rife with examples of information increasing.

Don't you ever do some research, Frank?