tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57889374024660648912024-03-05T09:45:53.485-08:00"Atheism Sucks!" sucksWE ARE THE ONLY SITE WE KNOW OF THAT ACTUALLY IS EXPOSING FRANK WALTON AND HIS MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES/ACCOUNTS! Check the RationalResponders.com website to verify we are legit! See the footer and best friends bar! And guess who is uber-pissed!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger139125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-18950803171682538612008-02-14T05:25:00.000-08:002008-02-14T05:39:02.732-08:00Frank Walton is his own stalker!!<p align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="color:#800000;">The ip addresses of Terry Pritchard, </span></span><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="color:#800000;">Frank Walton, and "Scary Jesus" all match!</span></span></p><p align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;">Source: <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com">Rational Response Squad</a></span></p><p align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://atheismsucks-sucks.blogspot.com/2008/01/frank-walton-is-his-own-stalker.html">Frank Walton is his own stalker part 1</a><br /></span></p><p align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://atheismsucks-sucks.blogspot.com/2008/01/have-ip-address-you-want-to-share.html">Have an IP address to share about Frank Walton?</a></span></p><p align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;">The <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Christian values of Frank Walton, scumbag for Jesus</a>.<br /></span></p><p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size:130%;">Administrators of other websites that want to look through their logs and see potential matches to increase the amount of sock-puppets/alter-egos we can attach to the name Frank Walton should contact RRS or post the info here. We'll see it as a moderated comment, but wont post it.</span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-22767297973466977752008-01-26T20:14:00.000-08:002008-01-26T20:43:36.432-08:00John Deering doesn't want to be associated with FrankJohn Deering is talking with RRS leaders about the likelihood that he is <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton, in this thread.</a> He provided several pieces of evidence that would help to prove that he is John Deering, however like Sapient said, this could be Frank Waltons real name. "John Deering" also expresses frustration that such an inference could or would be made.<br /><br />Yup, Frank Walton supposedly disgusts him that much. And that is what we understand, John is speaking our language. So to be fair to "John Deering" we want to state that he has announced the equivalent of an internet press release without threat of lawsuit, mind you. He wants you to know that he is definitely not Frank Walton. <br /><br />Here are the two "fairest" quotes from "John Deering" we can offer you.<br /><br /><blockquote>I am, believe it or not, a "reasonable guy", but I need you and this site to acknowledge the only reasonable explanation, and that is that I think very little of Walton as well but that I'm not him. His madness is his own, mine madness is my own. That’s true for all of us.... - Snarf</blockquote><br /><br /><blockquote>I want the unfounded rumor that I'm Walton to go away and I want it to go away soon. - Snarf</blockquote><br /><br />Once again you can see the <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">John Deering is not Frank Walton exchange in this thread.</a> Sapient requested now reduce the level of likelihood that John Deering is actually Frank Walton from "highly likely" to just "possible." Further evidence has been requested by Sapient to clear more names. The men "in question" can submit pictures, revealing their identity without masks and all the crap and hold a sign in the picture. Sapient talks about it in <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">the thread.</a><br /><br />Sapient admits it's not likely to happen.<br /><br />A response is being prepared for M on his defense of Frank at atheismsucks, in which he claims he used to be split personality and now he's not. We find this claim odd, from what we know of it, you can't just lose split personality disorder. It's actually more likely for one of your personalities to say "I used to have split personality disorder." Again... this is just our research. We found it highly ironic and are puzzled by what happens if we apply Occams's Razor.<br /><br />Happy now John?Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-86984669655965602542008-01-21T00:38:00.000-08:002008-12-11T21:59:40.988-08:00Could someone other than Frank Walton post?Today we've been getting hit by the seemingly multiple personality psychotic freak who usually refers to himself as <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a>. Now that we have IP proof he is his own stalker his comments seem funnier and funnier. But also sad. He needs to seek mental help and fast. Here are the comments that we won't allow to be posted as we believe them to all be from the same psychotic freak. Also, he doesn't allow you to post any comments that expose him in this manner on his blog so we only think it's fair. <br /><br />Update: For the record, there was a <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">controversy in which John Deering wants it known that he is not Frank Walton</a>. We're not sure what we believe.<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/R5RauCijkaI/AAAAAAAAAA0/OVKl10e1k0A/s1600-h/franks_split_personalites.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/R5RauCijkaI/AAAAAAAAAA0/OVKl10e1k0A/s320/franks_split_personalites.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5157847220248351138" border="0" /></a><br />Atheists, let's get some support going here so we can all expose the most dishonest blogger for Jesus any of us have ever known. Please start linking to this blog, start getting the word out, and we'll keep the info coming! Frank, here's the good news, your jail cell is likely to be padded and not your typical facility. I'm sure you'll get plenty of drugs too! The jig is up Frank.<br /><br />If you have legitimate questions please post them here, we're ignoring the posts from Frank and his multiple personalities, as we refrain from conversing with psychopaths/sociopaths. Oh, Frank recently left a comment about seeing us in court, but we just wanted you to know Frank we probably wont show up at your trial, we'll be here hoping you get the best treatment possible.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">UPDATE: </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://atheismsucks-sucks.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-deering-doesnt-want-to-be.html">John Deering threatens lawsuit, does provide some "evidence" and wants it known that he doesn't want to ever be associated with Frank Walton</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">. </span><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><br />P.S. The only reason we've allowed the ip's above to be exposed are that Frank Walton himself has posted the exact ip's claiming they are his stalkers on his site in which he is lying. We don't know what the ip's are but we know that the person posting them is Frank, as he created the account "Rational Response Squad Jr" in a fit of trademark infringement and false impersonation. He has used the "Rational Response Squad Jr" account to act like a complete buffon, something the real rational response squad wouldn't do. Furthermore the RRS leaders have stated they never authorized Frank to use their name, he did so in violation of several laws. </span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-5122485509088938062008-01-20T01:02:00.000-08:002008-01-26T20:56:48.421-08:00Have an IP address you want to share?If you have an IP address of <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> or anyone who he claims to be impersonating him, please feel free to post it as a comment to this post with the title or opening phrase "IP address."<br /><br />This post is a statement of confirmation that the information will not be posted publicly on this site and will only be used to prosecute <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> or whoever the real person is behind him to the fullest extent of the law. We would like to connect more dots to this puzzle. Spread the word to anyone you know that has been attacked by <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a>. You have our promise the information will only be used in a court of law.<br /><br />If you would like to add a disclaimer stating that it is ok to post the IP if we can find confirmation that such action is legal, please add the disclaimer.<br /><br />If you have been cyber-stalked, lied about, attacked, threatened, or harrassed by any of the following people help us complete the puzzle by posting the comment/IP here and it will wait in moderation for our crack staff. There are many ips known within this puzzle, we're looking to find more conclusive connections here.<br /><br />If you doubt the legitimacy of this site please view the footer of the highest ranked atheist website in the world to see that they have our "blessing." <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/">http://www.rationalresponders.com</a><br /><br /><div align="center"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">These are the names we believe the Christian who calls himself Frank Walton goes by:</span></div><div align="center">Abnoxio, Alan Baxter, HGissufficient, Mark Cote, MrBright, Rich Voss, S_Allegory, stanlee, <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Terry Pritchard(fully confirmed)</span>, <span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 102);">John G. Deering(<a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">possible</a>)</span>, <span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 102);">Scary Jesus (extremely likely)</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />UPDATE: Due to the fact that we're not idiots and are able to piece a puzzle together, we must add that<span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 102);"> <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Corey Washington is (highly likely)</a></span> also Frank Walton. Further we are elevating the possibility that <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">John Deering</a> and <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Scary Jesus</a> are also <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a>. UPDATE: We now slightly lower the possibility that John Deering is Frank Walton. <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">READ ALL THE DETAILS HERE</a>.</span><br /><br />Frank, you think we are stupid? You think we're gonna take your threats?<br /><br /></span></div><br />If you feel insecure posting the ip info here you can send the info to anyone you trust within the RRS and they will add it to our findings and help prepare the info for the courts and the feds.<br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"> UPDATE: </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://atheismsucks-sucks.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-deering-doesnt-want-to-be.html">John Deering threatens lawsuit, does provide some "evidence" and wants it known that he doesn't want to ever be associated with Frank Walton</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">. </span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-69617239701471020082008-01-19T23:27:00.000-08:002008-01-26T20:52:50.479-08:00Frank Walton is his own stalker!!!Frank Walton the dishonest Christian blogger is own stalker(s)!!! We have IP proof and are looking into the legalies of exposing this sick fuck online. More coming soon. When we say he is his own stalker, we mean that he purposefully creates sites that hate on himself and then he attacks himself. He's gone so far as to whine about how someone wants him dead... that someone is himself pretending to be an atheist stalker!!!<br /><br />Furthermore there are two blogs created by John Deering, one of which claims to be all about reposting everything Frank Walton says and allowing free speech on the site. In other words since the blog at atheismsucks censors almost all comments that disagree with this sick fucking freak, supposedly "John Deering" created a blog to allow any comments to be made. This sat odd with us that Frank Walton (the sick fuck hopefully soon to get the padded cell and straight jacket that he needs) would allow someone to abuse his copyright. So a bunch of people spent the day posting this comment on his site (a comment that any true Walton hater would love):<br /><br /><br /><blockquote>Best we can tell Frank is an insane man not just because of his religion, but due to actual issues. Here is a post that describes the deceit of <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> Also the only legitimate site we know of that exposes Frank, in a sometimes satirical manner is this site all about <a href="http://atheismsucks-sucks.blogspot.com/">Frank Walton and his atheism sucks friends.</a></blockquote><div align="left"><br />Now John Deering, the free speech king who wants you to believe he hates Frank Walton is censoring the best exposes on that fucking asshole who has illegally defamed the character of almost every important atheist in the world. Including defaming the character and lying incessantly about the <a href="http://rationalresponders.com/">Rational Response Squad</a> and specifically <a href="http://briansapient.com/">Brian Sapient</a>.<br /><br />What's really fucked up about this twatbag is that he's actually managed to convince a few atheists of his stories. Proving of course that atheists can act with poor logic as well.<br /><br /><strong><span style="font-size:130%;">If you are an atheist blogger, to protect the safety of others you should remove all comments from anyone who seems to support this fuckface.</span></strong> </div><br />Do not trust: John Deering (<a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">who claims to want to be unassociated with Frank</a>), Terry Pritchard, Ted Bell, Frank Walton we currently believe that we have a strong case to prove that all of these men are the same people. Stalking each other. Is it split personality, or simply conning for Jesus? Honestly we don't care, we look forward to letting the cybercrimes unit figure it out.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">UPDATE: </span><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://atheismsucks-sucks.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-deering-doesnt-want-to-be.html">John Deering threatens lawsuit, does provide some "evidence" and wants it known that he doesn't want to ever be associated with Frank Walton</a><span style="font-weight: bold;">. </span><br /><br />If you are an FBI agent interested in this story, or a lawyer and would like to fight a case against one of the biggest frauds to attack atheists online in the last 5 years, please post a comment anywhere on this site and we will find it.<br /><br />Also, if you can show us proof that posting IP addresses is not illegal, our crack staff is researching it now, please inform us by posting a comment.<br /><br />Oh by the way John Deering posted on our site in the blog post below this one, stating that Frank Walton thinks John is Ted Bell. This seems like something Walton has said before. More proof coming soon, stay tuned!Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-13151598877128331442008-01-17T00:43:00.000-08:002008-01-17T02:28:48.673-08:00Frank Walton banned by very pleasant atheist<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:180%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">ONE CASE OF CHRISTIAN DECEIT PICKED APART</span></span><br /></div><br />Many people know the <a href="http://uncrediblehallq.blogspot.com/2007/01/frank-walton-is-banned.html">Uncredible Hallq</a> as a very pleasant person who values rational and critical inquiry over rash judgment, which is why <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> being banned from his blog speaks quite a bit about Frank, the internet scumbag of the 21st century.<br /><br />Here is what he posted when he banned Frank, and some extra commentary added by our crack staff.<br /><blockquote>I was tolerating him for awhile, but from this point onward Frank Walton is banned from this blog. Frank, if you post here, even in response to this thread, your comment will be deleted. Then I will turn on comment moderation and not let any of your comments through, even though this will be a pain to everyone else.<br /><br />This ban was prompted by a comment made by Walton in which he claimed that the members of the Rational Response Squad advocate shooting Christians. I followed the posted link, and found that the main basis for this claim was not not anything said by the actual <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/our_team">members of the RRS</a>, but a guest (one time, as far as I can tell). The comment was not even made on their show. </blockquote>That's right Uncredible, actually I think that comment was made by <a href="http://mrgawn.com/">Mr. Gawn</a>. Mr Gawn is a rap artist, and he created a song including some words about burning christians if they don't convert, however us sane individuals recognize this as merely art. Best we can tell Frank never posted any portion of the truth from the story. We've all heard rappers and musicians say things in their music that they'd never do. It's art and we accept it as art. What Frank and his cronies do and did was slanderous.<br /><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Here are the facts:<br /></span><div style="text-align: left;"><ul><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mr. Gawn has never physically hurt another Christian.</span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mr Gawn wrote and recorded his song before he ever had a conversation with any RRS founding member.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mr Gawn was a fan of the RRS, and they weren't familiar with him until the song was sent by Gawn to their email.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;"><a href="http://www.briansapient.com/">Brian Sapient</a> said on <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/">RRS radio</a> "this is definitely not our message" directly to Mr. Gawns face.</span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Frank Walton has misled his readers by pretending as if this message was condoned by RRS and that RRS would actually condone violence.</span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">The RRS is mostly comprised of pacifists who pride themselves on a non-violent message.</span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;"><a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> has lied to discredit the work of the RRS by instilling fear in you.<br /></span></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Such action is illegal, and subject to heavy fines.<br /></span></li></ul>If <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> has told this lie on your blog, feel free to post the link to it on this blog so that we can make it easier for the RRS to find it and include it in any future lawsuit.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></div></div><br />We asked Sapient to provide the audio to show 43. The recording happened on the first day that RRS met Mr. Gawn. <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/nonviolentrrs.mp3">Here is the proof that Sapient and RRS do not condone the violence that Frank Walton disgustingly has tried to brainwash you into believing (includes entire song)</a>. You sick dishonest fuck, <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a>. You're a disgrace to humankind.<br /><br /><br /><blockquote>His other basis was a comment made by Rook Hawkins about getting rid of people like Walton. This comment said nothing about actual violence, and occured in the context of Hawkins calling Walton on another bogus charge, in this case a charge of plagarism. It was the equivalent of saying "we should get rid of politicians who lie their way into office"--not in any way applying they should be killed.</blockquote>The Rational Response Squad and <a href="http://www.rookhawkins.com/">Rook Hawkins</a> refer to theism as a concept that should be gone from this planet. They often say it should be "eradicated." For emphasis and umph, sometimes they say we need to rid the world of "theists." What they mean when they say this, is that we need to remove the conditions from society that cause theism, by doing so there would be no theists. They would never condone harming another person simply for believing in a god, in fact everything they do is for the betterment of humanity. They believe that only through the removal of religion can we start making major progress towards world peace. Mr. Gawn himself believes this. Have you ever heard Eminem talk about puking when he thinks about Kim Mathers? Or have you heard him talk about killing Kim Mathers and stuffing her in a trunk? It's art! They are the things we think but don't do. Is Frank too stupid to get this? Or is he a delusional fraud? Or is he simply a conman? Whatever he is, he's a shining example that theism is a delusion that needs to be eradicated.<br /><blockquote>Those familiar with Walton will know that this is part of a long pattern with him. I know Daniel Morgan consulted with a lawyer who said that if Walton's targets wanted to prosecute, they would have a strong libel case. I assume the RRS is fully aware of Walton's claims and has their reasons for not prosecuting.</blockquote>The RRS has every intention of suing Frank Walton, as well as preparing his criminal activities on a silver platter for the feds. As I understand it, they have not done so due to the lack of an inexpensive lawyer and due to lack of time. They've also talked about the fact that anybody that believes the crap coming out of Frank Walton is too stupid to be part of their team. With more important projects that they could pro-actively engage in, they simply haven't had the ability to take the time to compile the thousands upon thousands of instances of defamation of character committed by <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a><a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">.</a><br /><br /><blockquote>In any case, this blog will not be a venue for libel. I have no intention of rescinding this ban at any point in the future--I once started deleting his comments before but let him back, and after a second offense I see no reason to be so forgiving.</blockquote>We urge and suggest that anyone who has ever had a comment posted on their site by Frank Walton should remove it from their blog immediately. Frank seems to be trying to get members of the <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/">Rational Response Squad</a> murdered with his rhetoric, and how ironic is that? Don't allow yourself to be a pawn in Frank Walton's sick game, remove his content immediately.<br /><br />If you see <a href="http://christianpwnage101.blogspot.com/2007/04/frank-walton-fiasco.htm">Frank Walton</a> committing illegal acts for Jesus, please feel free to post them all over this site.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-38534002106559742102008-01-16T23:59:00.001-08:002008-12-11T21:59:41.162-08:00Rich Rodriguez on Frank Walton<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/R48MESijkZI/AAAAAAAAAAo/ZkDuBVSi_Jg/s1600-h/Midvale.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/R48MESijkZI/AAAAAAAAAAo/ZkDuBVSi_Jg/s200/Midvale.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5156353366198292882" border="0" /></a>Reposting a comment from <a href="http://www.christianpwnage.com/">Rich Rodriguez</a>, who if you haven't heard... happens to have a 10.5 inch penis and several children if you know what I'm saying. Know what I'm saying?<br /><br />Small penis Frank Walton recently posted some misleading statements on a blog after Gene Cook got his ass stomped by <a href="http://www.christianpwnage.com/">Rich Rodriguez</a> of The <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/">Rational Response Squad</a>. One of Franks specialties is misleading statements, which he got an A+ in. He only got an "A" in compulsive lying. The school, of course, was the Midvale School for the Gifted where he learned how to dry off cars--a really tough but rewarding job. After all, who is gonna dry off Rich's large penis after he takes it through the car wash?<br />From <a href="http://www.christianpwnage.com/">Rich Rodriguez</a>:<br /><p></p><blockquote><p>Frank Walton is an internet Troll who is an embarrassment to all who call themselves Christians. Don’t take my word for it Google what others have to say about him.<br /><br />On the so-called debate:<br />Frank has routinely refused to debate me live without editing all my comments.<br /><br />Here is the truth about what happened in the <a href="http://christianpwnage101.blogspot.com/2007/04/frank-walton-fiasco.htm">Frank Walton vs Rich Rodriguez fiasco</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036" rel="nofollow">This is the only post about Frank Walton you will ever need to read</a><br /><br /><a href="http://uncrediblehallq.blogspot.com/2007/01/frank-walton-is-banned.html" rel="nofollow">Why Frank Walton was banned</a><br /></p><p><a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/08/why-do-some-people-hate-frank-walton.html" rel="nofollow">Why people hate Frank Walton<br /></a></p><br /><br /></blockquote>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-43934375802295851152008-01-14T19:36:00.000-08:002008-01-14T20:03:22.101-08:00Attention atheists, a jerk wants you!Gene Cook wants to have atheist guests on his radio show again! LOL<br /><br />Gene Cook used to have atheists on his show about once a week, until so many atheists figured out that he was pointless to have a discussion with. He was almost always highly insulting, actually thinking that atheists would buy the stupid shit that comes out of his mouth. Are you kidding me? It's been a while since we've seen pansy leech (copy everything Infidel Guy does) Gene in action, glad he's back to help everyone remember why they're atheists, because almost everyone is an atheist now, all because of Gene Cook!<br /><br />Gene is a TAGer, which basically means he is at the bottom of the thinker totem pole. He actually thinks that we must assume God exists at the start of everything, and then attributes the creation of everything to God. Instead of answering the question of "how did god come into existence" Gene just assumes God must have been at the start. And if you don't agree with him, like most idiots who fall for the presuppositionist argument, he insults you by telling you you don't know where logic came from. When you say the brain, he says where did that come from? When you go far enough back you find out that Gene doesn't except the Big Bang or the existence of eternal energy (um, ya know, things we have proof for, dur) he claims that it must be god at the start. He does so with the thinking skills of a 6 year old, and his idiot friends at atheismsucks actually support him! MORONS! HAHA<br /><br />Oh, if you're so stupid you actually fall for that <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/ontological_and_epistemological_blunders_tag">TAG argument, read this.</a><br /><br />No respectable atheist would ever tell you an interview with Gene was fair, because Gene is a jerk. Just ask the people he swindled in to appearing on his piece of shit show: Dan Barker, Michael Shermer, John W. Loftus, Doug Krueger, Robert Price, etc. Cook has always been a jerk to them. Ask any atheist who was on his show and they'll concur. <a href="http://unchainedradio.com/new/index.php?option=com_contact&Itemid=33">Contact Cook if you're up for an idiotic time!</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-72074373526095030712008-01-12T22:02:00.000-08:002008-01-12T22:37:39.239-08:00Christian speaks out about Frank Walton<blockquote><p>I don’t want this to turn into an anti-Frank Walton ministry, but I thought that I would offer up one more post on why his “ministry” is not a Christian one.</p> <p>First, the new poll on the side. He asks for the best word to describe Brian Sapient. The choices are less than Christian ways to describe any individual.</p> <p>While Sapient and I disagree ideologically, a small part of me wishes that I had the ability to devote my life full-time to my writing and ministry. Sapient has the opportunity to do that, and he seems very driven at his activism. I suppose, therefore, the word I would choose to best describe Sapient is “driven.” I think it fits better than the choices that Frank has offered up. - Josiah Concept Ministries</p></blockquote>It's nice when Christian are willing to admit that <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> is a disgrace. <a href="http://josiahconcept.org/2007/12/03/more-on-frank-walton/">Here Cory writes</a> about his reasons for disliking <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://josiahconcept.org/2007/12/05/refuting-the-brood-of-vipers-defense/">Cory disagrees</a> with Wank Falton and J.P. Holding (another idiot Christard who'd probably kill an atheist before buying him dinner):<br /><blockquote>The purpose of this post is not to attack Frank Walton again. As Brian Sapient has stated, Frank’s tactics speak for themselves and I don’t need to delve any further. What I am doing with this post is to consider the “Brood of Vipers” defense itself, and whether it is a valid defense for conducting a ministry in the fashion that Walton does and Holding did once upon a time.</blockquote>Frank, you're so dumb, it serves you right that your hate site is hated by those you would want to align with. HAHA! Christians hate the <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Christian Prince Frank Walton</a>. LOOOOOOOSSSEER!Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-29599977373007364062008-01-12T21:44:00.000-08:002008-12-11T21:59:41.559-08:00Frank Walton encourages harrassing atheists!From <a href="http://atheism.about.com/b/2005/08/11/harassing-atheists.htm">about.com</a><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/R4mmFSijkYI/AAAAAAAAAAg/ckPDftn68Ho/s1600-h/har.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/R4mmFSijkYI/AAAAAAAAAAg/ckPDftn68Ho/s400/har.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5154833858308575618" border="0" /></a><br />Frankie, you really are a sick fuck aren't you? When will you learn that you are exactly the reason so many people have come to realize that being Christian has no benefits?Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-18107953443922827752007-11-27T12:01:00.000-08:002007-11-27T12:01:27.029-08:00Debunking Christianity: Dr. Bill Craig, Frank Walton, and me.<a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/01/dr-bill-craig-frank-walton-and-me.html">Debunking Christianity: Dr. Bill Craig, Frank Walton, and me.</a><br /><br /><div class="shortpost">Frank Walton criticized me for basically name-dropping on his site.<br /><br />I noticed Frank doesn't allow for any comments on his blog, like I have allowed him on mine. I'm not opposed to differing opinions. They help us to think and they make us grow. So I've decided to publish what he said and try to offer a response. I did eliminate one reference to Dr. Craig though, okay? :)<br /><br />Some thoughts:</div><br /><div class="fullpost">I'm not sure what he means when he says Carrier and Barker are trying to make a name off of Christians. Such a claim doesn't really make sense to me. They just want to debunk Christianity, like I do.<br /><br />The accusation of name-dropping isn't so bad if that's the best charge he can make against me, now is it? And while he misaccuses me of some <em>ad hominem</em> argument, he should focus on the substance of what I put on my blog, even if I'm merely providing links to other arguments.<br /><br />Take for example Richard Carrier's few paragraphs copied in my previous post, below. Frank, try dealing with that next time, okay?<br /><br />I'll be updating my blog/links listings from time to time, depending on the content of those blogs. Don't be surprised if I delete yours if that's the best you can do. I want reasonable links and/or blogs, and it may take me a while to find the best ones--ones which don't resort to ridicule and contain a higher level of thinking. I'm looking for suggestions to make this blog a pretty damn good one.<br /><br />Frank Walton:<br /><strong>What Loftus is saying in effect is this, "I know that Dr. Craig is one of the greatest modern Christian thinkers. I was even a student of his! But guess what, I'm not a Christian anymore. Which goes to show how unconvincing Dr. Craig is!"</strong><br /><br />Actually, what I'm saying is that the arguments just aren't there, period, no matter who the defender of Christianity happens to be. If it's true of Dr. Craig's arguments, then it should be true of most all other apologists, although, I know I'm just speaking for myself.<br /><br />By telling you I was his former student I got your attention, didn't I? What's wrong with that? People usually want to know of our credentials. Isn't that something you'd like to know? If you were a former student of his, I'm sure we'd hear about it too.<br /><br />In a way, I would like to pressure Bill into debating me. I had initially asked him if he would want to co-author a book as a dialogue between a professor and former student, but he declined, saying "that would give me no joy."<br /><br />I will say this though, it took a major crisis in my life plus nearly six intense years of thinking and soul-searching to break free from the arguments I had once defended. The last two beliefs of mine I rejected were the resurrection of Jesus and then later the belief in God. These two beliefs of mine were so well ingrained within me, especially as the result of Dr. Craig's teaching and writing, that they were the last ones I rejected. For me, his arguments were very tough to break free of, but in the end, I did break free of them. Not because of rebellion against God or him, but just as the result of the logical educated process of thought.<br /><br />Another thing. I like Bill very much. I recently told him that I have nothing personal against him, and that I was sorry if I am an embarrassment to him. But the arguments just were not there, period. I have to follow what I believe to be the truth. That's all I can do.<br /><br />And since I don't believe in Christianity, I want to help others break free from it's narrow-minded, superstitious, guilt producing, and pre-scientific thinking.</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-46211068288207372682007-11-27T12:00:00.000-08:002007-11-27T12:00:25.798-08:00It's the Agnostic Blackhole!: Frank Walton pussies out yet again......<a href="http://furyangankage.blogspot.com/2007/08/frank-walton-pussies-out.html">It's the Agnostic Blackhole!: Frank Walton pussies out yet again......</a><br /><br /><p><a style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" href="profile/15975507689047753908" rel="nofollow" onclick="">Frank Walton</a><span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"> said... </span> </p><p style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"> Besides, from the look of most of the crap on your site, you are a hack, a lousy, foulmouthed imbecile. Why don't you learn the basics of the english language first, then move on to debating. Plus you're a coward. And you suck.<br />I personally have no time for the likes of you.<br /><br />Toodles Furyanus<br /><br />The real Frank Walton</p>There we go with the blind assumptions again....... Frank, your calling me a coward and yet you refuse to debate. Thats Cowardliness. I suck eh? Frank you have yet to debate me. Frank if your going to act so better than me. Then how about you prove it. Your all bark and no action, pitiful. Even Christians note your cowardliness. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Even "</span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">destinylab</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">" The delusional man who believes alien's are demons CALLED YOU A COWARD. The most delusional Christian on the on this little blue planet has a beef with you. </span>That tells me something about you frank. At least "<span style="font-style: italic;">destinylab</span>" who may be 3 fries shorter than a happy meal is honest. A delusional Christian atleast has some decency.<br /><br />Frank, the only thing you ARE capable of doing is talking out of your ass, making assumptions, and spitting out childish insults.<br /><br />No frank I'm not coming to your little forum. If you want to PROVE you are better than me, It will be right here, right now. Until you debate me frank, your nothing but what you just called me, <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);">"you are a hack, a lousy, foulmouthed imbecile" </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Hypocrite</span>.<br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Frank what you call a moderated debate more than likely involves a whole forum full of Christians whom are on your side. that would edit posts that contained blasphemous comments, and my favorite word of all "Fuck"<br /><br />No thank you, It will be right here, Furyan's yard.</span></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-13301964533555254752007-11-27T11:59:00.000-08:002007-11-27T11:59:31.552-08:00Debunking Christianity: Why Do Some People Hate Frank Walton?<a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/08/why-do-some-people-hate-frank-walton.html">Debunking Christianity: Why Do Some People Hate Frank Walton?</a><br /><br /><div class="shortpost">Frank Walton complains about being harrassed by atheists in the comments section <a href="http://christiancadre.blogspot.com/2006/08/prejudice-against-atheists.html#comments">here</a>, when he said:</div><div class="fullpost"><br /><blockquote>Since having gone public with my website and blogsite I had threats hurled at me, racist comments made against me because of the color of my skin, my wife's name and our home address and phone number publicly published on a website and blogsite (I have this all documented by the way). I received one threat (via e-mail) so disturbing (he talked of raping my wife and lynching me) I had to call the police to see if we can find the guy.<br /><br />Not only that but agnostic Ed Babinski has hounded me for not giving out personal information about myself (where I'm from, what school I go to, my major, etc.). I told him that I didn't want to give out said information because I crave a certain amount of anonymity. It's for my protection from any fundamentalist atheist who may lash out at me or harass me. Guess what? Babinski didn't care. Instead of respecting my privacy, he continued to send me e-mails over and over and over again requesting personal info about myself. He went so far as to go to a Christian forum and accused me of "avoidance apologetics" and to provoke some personal information about myself! </blockquote>[To read Ed's response see <a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/08/eds-side-of-frank-walton-ed-babinski.html" target="_blank">Ed's side of the story</a>].<br /><br />Poor Frank Walton. There's just something about him that causes atheists to hate him. He maligns and disrespects and berates us at every opportunity. Then when he reports how mad atheists get over his tactics the story gets even further twisted to make it sound much worse than it really is. He may have a persecution complex for all I know. He wants to be hated for Jesus' sake, so he hates. He hates those who attack his God, and any tactic including lies and exaggerations and half truths in defending his God from our arguments is his mission. He brings most all of it on himself, and I do not believe him when he claims he's been persecuted like he says he has, either. I believe he's a fabricator of the truth and a liar.<br /><br />The truth is that atheists and Christians alike can bring people to hate them for being offensive and for personal attacks. People cannot take personal attacks for long before they get mad. And in this sense Walton brings it on himself. It's just hard to ignore someone who is this obnoxious and this stupid.<br /><br />So here's Walton's strategy everyone: Provoke atheists by calling them names, by sidetracking conversations, by quoting them out of context, by belittling and berating them, and when they finally respond he plays the sympathy card. Even a puppy dog can be provoked to bite back, Walton.<br /><br />I know I should ignore him, but it's just tough to do, since he constantly dogs my steps. His tactics deserve to be exposed for what they really are...sick. No one on his website is as stupid or as vile as he makes them out to be. Furthermore, anyone who will reasonably discuss what we write here at Debunking Christianity receives a polite discussion in return, as everyone who regularly reads my Blog knows full well. It's just that when it comes to us here at DC Walton and some others of his ilk personally attack us. I expected it. But I don't like it. There is a fortress mentality among some Christians that when they see us attempt to debunk their faith it's seen as a serious personal affront to themselves and to their God. We don't see ourselves intending anything personal here. We just disagree, that's all.<br /><br />Walton's whole tactic is to <a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/03/poisoning-well.html" target="_blank">poison the well</a>.<br /><br /><strong>Walton and Paul Manata continue to attack me for one comment I made in February of 2006 when I predicted that Paul would probably beat his wife based on his conversion story, something which I said after Paul had harrassed me constantly for weeks. I wish I hadn't said it, and I'm sorry for having done so. Please note that I never said I hoped Paul would beat his wife. <em>I actually said that I hope he does not do anything of the sort, only that his behavior tells a different story</em></strong>. To see what was actually said <a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/02/paul-manatas-wife-and-his-ugly-past.html" target="_blank">see here</a>.<br /><br />Once Walton was so bad that he was forced to <a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/06/frank-walton-recognized-he-was-wrong.html" target="_blank">remove objectional material from his website</a>. </div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-35247581303210939612007-10-07T11:44:00.001-07:002007-10-07T11:48:54.562-07:00This letter sent to Frank Walton<a href="http://rationalresponders.blogspot.com/2007/10/rrs-caught-stealing-footage.html">Frank Walton recently accused the RRS of stealing, without the facts.</a> What else is new?<br /><br />FROM THINKER HA:<br /><blockquote>The following is an email I sent to Frank Walton:<br /><br />Hi,<br /><br />I post at youtube as user ThinkerHA, and I noticed your comments regarding a quote of mine you used to accuse the RRS of "stealing." Had you investigated the facts by contacting one of the parties involved, your conclusions would be different.<br /><br />I gave permission to the RRS to use the video for Downey's account, and I also approve of what the RRS does. Rather than investigate the matter, you posted an ill-informed message on your blog to attack the RSS. That makes me wonder what other errors you have on your blog due to having a limited amount of facts.<br /><br />This is a fine example that you should be dealing with issues rather than attack people. Had you stuck to the issues regarding theism your attempt to go after individuals would not leave you with a error-rife blog about people.<br /><br />Let me make clear again: I gave permission to the RRS to use the video, I approve of what the RRS does, and you failed to contact anyone involved in the situation.<br /><br />If you want want to confirm my identity, send me a message.<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ThinkerHA">http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ThinkerHA</a><br /><br />I am not attacking you or your beliefs, just trying to set the record straight.</blockquote>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-23175718185865661632007-09-24T21:10:00.000-07:002008-12-11T21:59:42.041-08:00Frank Waltons favorite Christian activity and entertainment<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/RviL-bk3lWI/AAAAAAAAAAU/vpCcu2LeCwY/s1600-h/WaltonUFC.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_cH_JDnQFK-A/RviL-bk3lWI/AAAAAAAAAAU/vpCcu2LeCwY/s400/WaltonUFC.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5113991281549743458" border="0" /></a><br />Frank Walton would like you to believe that Christians hold the moral high ground to atheists. Frank advocates kicking the teeth in of some who disagree with him. He also openly admits one of his favorite forms of entertainment and activities is UFC fighting. Well kickboxing is less violent and a little less Christian, but check it out...<br /><br /><object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/c3btCIwnPbs"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c3btCIwnPbs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />Isn't Frank a great example of Christians? Offering to beat up women UFC style, eh Frank?<br /><br />You're a violent insane pussy, <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton.</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-51116674388671025192007-09-22T19:28:00.000-07:002007-09-22T20:06:40.614-07:00Frank Walton is a hypocrite!We just found out today about a glaring <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">hypocrisy in Frank Walton</a>. (not that there was any doubt before as to his twatwadish behavior)<br /><br />Frank has apparently at one point whined about his personal information being posted and this is what he said:<br /><blockquote>"Not only that but agnostic Ed Babinski has hounded me for not giving out personal information about myself (where I'm from, what school I go to, my major, etc.). I told him that I didn't want to give out said information because<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"> I crave a certain amount of anonymity. It's for my protection from any fundamentalist atheist who may lash out at me or harass me. Guess what? Babinski didn't care.</span> Instead of respecting my privacy, he continued to send me e-mails over and over and over again requesting personal info about myself." - <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a></blockquote>Here is <a href="http://christiancadre.blogspot.com/2006/08/prejudice-against-atheists.html#c115524617243603177">a link </a>to his whining.<br /><br />Frank got what he deserves there, and I offer this thread as a place to post all of the personal information you want about <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a>. Since Frank found out Brian Sapient's real name, who he knows needs to be protected due to an onslaught of death threats unlike Walton will ever see, <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> has consistently posted Sapient's real name. Frank doesn't care!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> consistently posts Sapient's real name and is therefore putting other human life at risk including that of the innocent children in his life. For those that are curious, as anti-theistic as he is Sapient has offered to take his own child to church if he was interested, his child instead chose video games. He has apparently made this offer to his child every year, and seeks to shelter his child from the spectacles that he gets involved in, including requiring cameramen to never shoot his child.<br /><br />Someone on <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Waltons piece of shit blog</a> wrote that they hope "<i>nobody harrasses his family because of this exposure." </i>after <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton </a>made the post releasing Sapient's name<i>.</i><br /><br />Franks moronic and glaringly immoral excuse was:<br /><blockquote>"That's what I thought too at first. But I figured since he's encouraging the blasphemy challenge (where people have been stating their full names), why doesn't he just give out his real name instead of a fake one?" - <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a></blockquote><br />In other words Frank, since Ed Babinski has asked other people for their private info before, it was perfectly ok that he asked for yours. And since Ed Babinbski has given out some peoples info before it's ok to give out some of yours. <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> you are a fucking immoral hypocritical dumbass.<br /><br />Frank doesn't value the lives of others, he seems to only value his own, and those of the 3 people in the world who agree with him. This self serving disgustingly hypocritical attitude is what Christianity has to offer. Christians look in the mirror and you will find little dashes of <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">the worlds biggest asshole, Frank Walton</a> embedded in you.<br /><br />If you have information as to the whereabouts, the address, the job, the school, the anything, about Frank Walton... you are encouraged to use <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton's moronic logic</a>, and post all the info, since he sees nothing wrong with it.<br /><br />Maybe Sapient can use the info when he sues the shit out of Frank in the future.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-83610969394683949792007-09-20T06:57:00.000-07:002007-09-20T07:01:05.933-07:00The only post about Frank Walton you will ever need to read.The only post about <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> you will ever need to read.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.blogger.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">atheism sucks</a> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">atheismsucks.blogspot.com</a><br /><br />(Feel free to link the words <a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036">Frank Walton</a> to the above post so that it hits #1 in Google Ranking)<br /><br />Also check out this Frank Walton blog: <a href="http://frankwaltonchronicle.blogspot.com/">http://frankwaltonchronicle.blogspot.com</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.blogger.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/hamurookis_irrational_precepts/10036"> </a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-65193287728245502572007-07-10T11:31:00.000-07:002007-07-09T11:33:12.437-07:00Carlin on MadTV "Touched by an Atheist"<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" height="350" width="425" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/niqVVENiY2c"><br /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never"><br /><param name="allowNetworking" value="internal"><br /><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/niqVVENiY2c"><br /></object>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-10162765401487367682007-07-09T23:53:00.000-07:002007-07-08T23:58:18.333-07:00Index to Creationist ClaimsThis site kick ass. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html" target="_blank">Link</a>.<br /><br />Also, check this out...<br /><br /><strong>29+ Evidences for Macroevolution</strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/" target="_blank">Link</a>.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-23128342261028068952007-07-04T12:37:00.000-07:002007-07-04T12:54:37.778-07:00Save Me from MyselfI was at the mall today and my Christian friends were fighting each other like little girls over the last copy of this book.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://x.myspace.com/images/books/covers/0061251844-l.jpg"><img src="http://x.myspace.com/images/books/covers/0061251844-l.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br /></a><br /><i>"Save Me from Myself: How I Found God, Quit Korn, Kicked Drugs and Lived to Tell My Story" - </i>by Brian “Head” Welch.<br /><br />There was only one book left in the store.<br /><br />But the lady told us to leave the store because my Christian friends were loud, so all three of them didn't get the book.<br /><br />HAHA!<br /><br />Anyway, I'm going to recommend this book to all the Christians out there. Unknownnoreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-60279872558189910322007-06-29T01:48:00.000-07:002007-06-30T13:48:16.281-07:00Tagged!I've been tagged by <a href="http://atheisthussy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Intergalactic Hussy</a>. The following rules should explain the new blog meme.<br /><br /><div align="justify"><div align="justify">We have to post these rules before we give you the facts.<br /><br />Players start with eight random facts/habits about themselves.<br /><br />People who are tagged need to write their own blog about their eight things and post these rules.<br /><br />At the end of your blog post, you need to choose eight people to get tagged and list their names.<br /><br />Don't forget to leave them each a comment telling them they're tagged, and to read your blog.<br /></div><br /><br /></div><br /><br /><strong>Here are my eight random facts:</strong><br /><ol><li>I'm right-handed.<br /></li><li>I was born on December 25.<br /></li><li>Graduated from high school at age 17. Stupid jocks.<br /></li><li>I'm a big fan of boxing and the UFC. I've competed in grappling and boxing tournaments (and a few bare knuckle fights).<br /></li><li>I still practice Jeet Kune Do, Judo, Muay Thai and submission grappling.<br /></li><li>Also, I can speak 3 languages: English, Spanish, and Italian. (And a little bit of Dene Suline. I struggle speaking Dene.)<br /></li><li>I love watching zombie movies. 28 Weeks Later kicked butt. Does anybody know of any new zombies movies that are coming out?<br /></li><li>Nirvana, NIN, Sepultura and Devil Driver are my favorite bands.<br /></li></ol><br /><br />The blogs I'm choosing to tag are: <br /><a href="http://www.noor08.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Noor</a>.<br /><a href="http://zachsdailyrant.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Zach</a>.<br /><a href="http://www.healthyaddict.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ashley Schulte</a>.<br /><a href="http://txatheist.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">TXatheist</a>.<br /><a href="http://tcrum.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Tori</a>.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-67185235212772672332007-06-24T22:44:00.000-07:002007-06-25T02:51:34.305-07:00Ray Mercer got his shit ruined!!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b1/Mercer-vs-kimbo.jpg/435px-Mercer-vs-kimbo.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b1/Mercer-vs-kimbo.jpg/435px-Mercer-vs-kimbo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><br />Kimbo Slice beat Ray Mercer via submission (guillotine choke)! Oh well.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.mmanews.com/other/CFFC-5-Kimbo-Slice-vs.-Ray-Mercer-Results-From-623.html" target="_blank">Source</a>.<br /><br />Also, BJ Penn defeated Jens Pulva.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.fightnews.com/ufctuf.jpg"><img src="http://www.fightnews.com/ufctuf.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><span>***Update***</span><br /><br />If you missed the Slice/Mercer fight, you can watch it <a href="http://pandachute.com/videos/kimbo_slice_vs_ray_mercer" target="_blank">here</a>.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-13744004010050340152007-06-23T16:13:00.000-07:002007-06-23T16:17:02.706-07:00Brian Sapient had penis reduction surgery<a href="http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/the_rational_response_squad/8300" target="_blank">From here</a>.<br /><br />It's true-- I just happen to know one of the nurses who signed his cast post surgery. Apparently, Brian's penis was so large it was affecting various activities of daily living and so he opted to get it halved, and then halved again.<br /><br />"Some might think a huge cock is an argument in favor of intelligent design" said Sapient, while eating ice cream in the recovery room, "but it just didn't fit in any of the places I wanted to put it in, and shoe horns were just not an option for us".<br /><br />Brian's penis measured over 37 inches long, which qualified it as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The danger his large wanker posed to himself and others (especially the elderly) helped Brian make the decision for surgery, but really it was the taunting from school kids that made him opt for the surgeon's scalpel. <br /><br />"If I had a nickel for every time I was called the human tripod, I'd be in the top 10 supporter list here for the rrs. A little known fact about the RRS is it originally stood for "rod reduction surgery" as I envisoned starting a support group for men with mega cocks. But, surgery didn't just take my dong, it took my faith as well. I'm no longer chained down, either by a behemoth of a scholng or the lord jesus. So, I decided rational response squad was my true calling versus another internet site about penises-- or is it penii?"<br /><br />The compound was not immediately available for comment.Unknownnoreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-89154704470443295952007-06-19T17:26:00.000-07:002007-06-19T17:27:18.331-07:00Get god off our money, Sapient goes to dollar store<object enablejsurl="false" enablehref="false" saveembedtags="true" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" height="350" width="425" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/OaN83z84FAQ"><br /> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never"><br /> <param name="allowNetworking" value="internal"><br /> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OaN83z84FAQ"><br /> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"><br /></object><br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaN83z84FAQ">See it on youtube.</a><br /><br /><br />At the West Chester courthouse with Margaret Downey of <a href="http://www.fsgp.org">FSGP.org.</a><br /><object enablejsurl="false" enablehref="false" saveembedtags="true" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" height="350" width="425" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/bzbFSFjwELM"><br /> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never"><br /> <param name="allowNetworking" value="internal"><br /> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bzbFSFjwELM"><br /> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"><br /></object><br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzbFSFjwELM">See it on youtube.</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5788937402466064891.post-19700249319634404422007-06-18T21:32:00.000-07:002007-06-18T21:33:17.228-07:00Firewalking DebunkedMichael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine and monthly columnist for Scientific American, tries his hand at firewalking barefoot across 1000-degree red hot coals and doesn't get burned. Dr. Shermer provides a scientific explanation for the mysterious phenomenon.<br /><br /><object enablejsurl="false" enablehref="false" saveembedtags="true" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="never" allownetworking="internal" height="350" width="425" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/-W5FRl0qhOM"><br /> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never"><br /> <param name="allowNetworking" value="internal"><br /> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-W5FRl0qhOM"><br /></object>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1